I don't think that a company that is not a US company should be paying taxes to the US. If I'm a Bermuda company working in Bermuda and I sell my product to US citizens I shoud not have to pay the US for any of that money I make (if that's what you are referring to).
I believe that's the point of this thread. My novice understanding is if a US company (ACME Inc.) sets up a company in Bermuda (ACME Bermuda Ltd.) to receive the revenue from the UK manufacturing subsidiary (ACME UK Ltd.) where they manufacture widgets for sale worldwide, including the US, the IRS wants tax on the revenue from the US. Now if ACME Inc. changes their strategy and no longer offers widgets for sale in the US does the IRS have a valid claim for taxes? If you answer no that's where the congressmen come in and accuse ACME Inc. of tax evasion, money laundering, terrorist financing, baby seal beating, etc. and generally looting the US Treasury. There are many other moral arguements against this type of scheme but if the US wants to remedy this situation taxwise wouldn't you think the blame lies within the US and not on the offshore jurisdictions that legally facilitate the ACME Bermuda Ltd.'s?
OK, I don't mean to beat a dead horse....but...please note I said "Bermuda" company or make it any other country if you want. I didn't say a "US" company.
OK. But if a *** company working in *** sells products to US citizens, the IRS wants a piece - not my fight. My fight is US lawmakers painting an unwarranted negative picture of "tax havens" when the real problem has been caused by their own shortcomings. Stop Tax Haven Abuse - who's doing the abusing?







Forum - Rant Room 










