Bermuda Rocks
close
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Top Panel
Login / Profile
Top Panel

The Royal Gazette's

The Royal Gazette's A Right to Know - Giving People Power campaign

A Right to Know - Giving People Power campaign 

BWS Webcam

Webcam

Looking North toward
St. George's

Swag Shop

Bermuda Rocks 

from CafePress

Only $19.99 + S/H

 

Rant Room - Bermuda's #1 Forum

*
*
Home
Help
Search
Calendar
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 09, 2009, 07:06:01 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
76427 Posts in 4156 Topics by 861 Members Latest Member: - Gazza Most online today: 45 - most online ever: 66 (June 14, 2007, 11:37:46 AM)

Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: To the detriment of Young Bermudians (Facebook)  (Read 1593 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
jnc
Superhero Member
*****

Karma: 212
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1876


View Profile Awards




Ignore

« Reply #15 on: December 21, 2007, 01:12:20 PM »

to condon whites that will now refuse to help a persons development because they join a facebook group

So, what if she's reacting to what she perceives to be the content of their character, and not the colour of their skin. Would that be OK?

Quote
under cover racist

Yeah, yeah, yeah, anytime anyone does anything negative towards a person of another race, it's racism. I can't wait to apply that standard to everyone.

Noel
Logged

"Be what you wish to seem." -- Socrates
jnc
Superhero Member
*****

Karma: 212
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1876


View Profile Awards




Ignore

« Reply #16 on: December 21, 2007, 01:31:08 PM »

Did it ever occur to you that people didnt feel that the UBP was the right party to lead the country based on platform and/or quality of candidates compared to the UBP??

For a lot of people (not all of them), that's total nonsense, and you know it. They voted against the UBP because 'it's the white man's party', or for the PLP because 'the black man finally has power, we're not going to give it up'.

I'll give the people who said things like that credit for one thing: they were honest enough to admit it.

If the PLP had been able to compete purely in terms of platform, etc, they wouldn't have needed to roll out the "plantation" language. The fact that the party felt it necessary to whip up, and use, racial division is the surest proof than in terms of program alone, the PLP (rightly) felt it could not compete.

Quote
its a shame that she was given Bermudian status but she doesnt want to help Bermudians based on their political views??

Maybe it's because she perceives them to be aiding and acclaiming a party which whips up racial divisiveness when it suits them, for their own gain, and for no other end than to retain power? So now it's not OK to refrain from dealing with people whom you perceive to be enabling (at the very least) racial prejudice?

And I love that sly comment about her status. Just curious, if she didn't already have it, I'll bet you'd want to see it denied to her, right?

Quote
And you wonder why Bermudians feel a certain way towards non-Bermudians.

And you wonder why non-Bermudians feel a certain way towards Bermudians.

Quote
try to have some open dialogues (face to face not by keyboard strokes).

Oh, right. Face-to-face dialogue with partisans for a government which has thrown people off the island for making a dumb joke, or because they had the balls to speak their mind - in other words, a government which feels free to use its power to drastically penalize people for simply speaking their mind?

They can't put Bermudians on the next plane, but if they are willing to use their power to make people pay a price for speaking their mind, what's to say they won't use any of the innumerable levers at their control to do basically the same with Bermudians?

You ought to be thankful for the anonymity of cyberspace - without it, I can guaran-effing-tee you that there's be one hell of a less frank discussion than we have - and that wouldn't do almost anyone (other than those who would contrive to benefit from such a situation) any good.

Noel
Logged

"Be what you wish to seem." -- Socrates
oneeyeopen
Sr. Member
****

Karma: -36
Offline Offline

Posts: 496


View Profile Awards

Ignore
« Reply #17 on: December 21, 2007, 01:31:23 PM »

JNC, you and others have applied it throughout this election campaign and persons that speak pro black are  indeed hit with the racist label. However when in postion to correct anyone who is not of colour we see a real change of heart. This is the root of the problem is preception
Logged
jnc
Superhero Member
*****

Karma: 212
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1876


View Profile Awards




Ignore

« Reply #18 on: December 21, 2007, 01:36:46 PM »

The people she mentors are kids and these kids have been blinded through the media and their parents.

And the rest of the people in their community. Buy, yeah, good point - kids. I don't know how I'd handle this, but I don't know the kids in question. It would all depend on who they are as individuals, considered one at a time. And, of course, whether she's willing to disturb the serenity of the workplace by calling them on things she sees as wrong.

Noel

Logged

"Be what you wish to seem." -- Socrates
Uncle Elvis
Suckaholic Member
******

Karma: 323
Offline Offline

Posts: 3203


Peace be with you.


View Profile WWW Awards

Ignore
« Reply #19 on: December 21, 2007, 01:39:50 PM »

The problem oneeye is that... well, you're being to broad. Most of the people that were hit with the racist label recently weren't speaking "pro black", they were speaking anti-white racist hatred.

I can't speak for everyone, but I have a feeling that you'll find that most of the Bermudian bloggers ARE interested in equality and the empowerment of the black community, but only if done right and fairly. This attitude of "You white folks don't get it" when not followed up with explanation and education is counterproductive, as are the petty games, the namecalling, the taunting and the distinct lack of compassion from both sides.

Saying that those that speak pro black are called racist is disingenuous and is incorrect.
Logged

"It's not: whether or not you're going to get reamed... It's: Who's going to have the decency to give you a reach-around!"
-Uncle Elvis-

"Happiness DEMANDS giving up all hope of a better past"
-Nelson Mandela-

Oh, and for those who don't know, my name is Mike Hind.
jnc
Superhero Member
*****

Karma: 212
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1876


View Profile Awards




Ignore

« Reply #20 on: December 21, 2007, 01:42:55 PM »

However when in postion to correct anyone who is not of colour we see a real change of heart.

White people have been called racist so often, and so often incorrectly, that the term is basically useless as a censure now. Trust me, when I say something like "you can be upset without being insulting", they know damn well what the subtext is.

And you know what? Wrong is wrong, and skin colour shouldn't matter. So if someone says something offensive, a reply of "you can be upset without being insulting" is all you need to say - because if it's something wrong, it's wrong no matter the colour of whomever it's said to.

Noel

Logged

"Be what you wish to seem." -- Socrates
oneeyeopen
Sr. Member
****

Karma: -36
Offline Offline

Posts: 496


View Profile Awards

Ignore
« Reply #21 on: December 21, 2007, 01:49:10 PM »

Thats funny, a person grows up in  house were the parents are plp so they have been brainwashed about the plp. A person grows up in a house that speaks of the ubp and that in itself is the correct way and what one should believe. So all educated people have to support the UBP is this solely because the base of the party is white and they in turn have to smarter than any black person. If this is not the case then it would not matter one way or the other, what should matter is that they excersised their right to vote.

Nothing broad about the statement UE its the truth, you are correcct all persons should be concerned with equality not just for blacks, but for everyone, opportunities should be equal period, mutual respect should be used at all times, but when people accuse families of brain washing their own children then some are more than disingenous and thats correct.
JNC i do agree with you on that, but it's not often people call their friends out when wrong.
Logged
jnc
Superhero Member
*****

Karma: 212
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1876


View Profile Awards




Ignore

« Reply #22 on: December 21, 2007, 02:01:54 PM »

have to support the UBP is this solely because the base of the party is white and they in turn have to smarter than any black person.

Not sure I caught exactly what your point is here, but your comment about "smarter than any black person" is, I'm fairly sure, wrong (not to mention offensive, but I'll let that go, merely noting it). I'm not sure if/how I could convince you you're wrong, so for now, please just footnote that concept/characterization with a question mark that says 'not agreed to by all'.

Quote
it's not often people call their friends out when wrong.

Right; you don't want to turn whatever situation you're at from fun to heavy-duty, or you don't want to chance hurting a friend, or losing them, or for any number of reasons. Human nature... And it can sometimes be tricky to work out how to upbraid someone without getting their back up, or hurting them more than you need to (and, yah, sometimes you have to, and there's no getting around that, but it's best to minimize it).

But I try and step up on a regular basis - even if it's not in 100% of the situations where I could: I'm human too...

Noel

Logged

"Be what you wish to seem." -- Socrates
sandgrownan
Superhero Member
*****

Karma: 91
Offline Offline

Posts: 1093



View Profile Awards

Ignore
« Reply #23 on: December 21, 2007, 02:28:54 PM »

oneeyeopen: The iodicy of your argument is exactly what I'm getting at. Criticism of the PLP and their, loose, standards and performance had nothing to do with skin colour. Period. I wanted to see the real issues debated. The PLP flat out refused, instead taking to debate down to race.

By voting with their emotions and squandering any sort of bright future for Bermuda the folks that elected the PLP have created a climate of hate, mistrust and fear. EB refuses to offer his hand to the white community, Rolfe still insists that with a black government and a black civil service that whites must "still do more".

That's why I, an the individual referred to in the original post are at best concerned and at worst frightened. Where do we go now? The PLP believe they have a mandate to do as they please but the sad fact is the only people who see race or colour as a problem are black.
Logged
oneeyeopen
Sr. Member
****

Karma: -36
Offline Offline

Posts: 496


View Profile Awards

Ignore
« Reply #24 on: December 21, 2007, 03:44:54 PM »

oneeyeopen: The iodicy of your argument is exactly what I'm getting at. Criticism of the PLP and their, loose, standards and performance had nothing to do with skin colour. Period. I wanted to see the real issues debated. The PLP flat out refused, instead taking to debate down to race.

By voting with their emotions and squandering any sort of bright future for Bermuda the folks that elected the PLP have created a climate of hate, mistrust and fear. EB refuses to offer his hand to the white community, Rolfe still insists that with a black government and a black civil service that whites must "still do more".

That's why I, an the individual referred to in the original post are at best concerned and at worst frightened. Where do we go now? The PLP believe they have a mandate to do as they please but the sad fact is the only people who see race or colour as a problem are black.

How can you say blacks voted based on emotion, i don't agree with all that the Plp say or do. I will however work to fix some of the wrongs as a memeber and supporter. To say a climate of hate has been created because of this vote is in deed wrong. You might feel that way, but its not like that.
the Civil Service only became black when whites left in the 60's as black were hired, the same as when blackes moved into certain neighbourhoods in Bermuda, you choose to leave, you were not forced too. In regards to the government the Plp has earned the right  to be the government, the same as the ubp when they were government, the people spoke and excersised their right to vote.

The plp in no way think they have a mandate to do what they want, they will do whats best for the country, the people of Bermuda can if they want determine the direction of the country by making their voices heard when laws/ legislation are brought into place that will afffect the country in a nagative way.
Most people wanted to see issues debated, however that did not happen,the ubp stood by the agenda for change that had some questionable things in it and the plp stood by the pathways to progress that also had some questionable things in it. However 3strikes, bermuda status for longterm residents were to questinable to consider the ubp as an alternative at this time, also with the loss of dunkley and dodwell the debate in the house on that side will be a lot to be desired. One note that comes to light here Wayne Furbert set Dunkley up if what he said the day after the election is true, that he asked Dunkley to run in 10.
Logged
sandgrownan
Superhero Member
*****

Karma: 91
Offline Offline

Posts: 1093



View Profile Awards

Ignore
« Reply #25 on: December 21, 2007, 04:00:18 PM »

Yes, the PLP have in fact earned their right to govern, but my point is that it was based on emotion and not a policy platform. There were no concrete policy ideas that stood up to any sort of scrutiny.
Secondly, the PLP do believe they have a mandate to do as they please. The people of Bermuda have no rights - take a look at the anti-fronting legislation that discriminates against any Bermudian married to a non-Bemrudian, black, white or green. When the bar council, the group of concerned citizens and numerous others have protested against this flawed, crackpot legislation, Derrick Burgess told them to get lost. While well meaning, it was poorly executed.
The hysterical misrepresentation of three-strikes and the re-examining of PRC holders/status is a fine example of PLP scare mongering. The idiot electorate fell for it.
Logged
oneeyeopen
Sr. Member
****

Karma: -36
Offline Offline

Posts: 496


View Profile Awards

Ignore
« Reply #26 on: December 21, 2007, 04:20:19 PM »

Yes, the PLP have in fact earned their right to govern, but my point is that it was based on emotion and not a policy platform. There were no concrete policy ideas that stood up to any sort of scrutiny.
Secondly, the PLP do believe they have a mandate to do as they please. The people of Bermuda have no rights - take a look at the anti-fronting legislation that discriminates against any Bermudian married to a non-Bemrudian, black, white or green. When the bar council, the group of concerned citizens and numerous others have protested against this flawed, crackpot legislation, Derrick Burgess told them to get lost. While well meaning, it was poorly executed.
The hysterical misrepresentation of three-strikes and the re-examining of PRC holders/status is a fine example of PLP scare mongering. The idiot electorate fell for it.

So now because you did not get what you wanted the electorate are idiots, yes their were flaws in the legislation presented by Burgess, this legislation was not new it was mofied a bit, it was however placed on the books by the same group that is now saying its wrong. This same legislation lead to the creation of trust prepared by lawyers in the same law houses that have always supported the ubp and had some of its partners as memebers of parliament.
Logged
sandgrownan
Superhero Member
*****

Karma: 91
Offline Offline

Posts: 1093



View Profile Awards

Ignore
« Reply #27 on: December 21, 2007, 04:33:29 PM »

OK, I feel like I'm arguing with a Christian about the existance of God and inevitable circular discussion it creates.
1. The electorate are idiots because they misused their democratic right to vote by voting based on emotion and not on the issues of the day.
2. I know they did this because the PLP didn't produce a concrete platform ergo, it (the vote) must have been based on emotion.
3. Furthermore, since the PLP ran on a issue of race only, there is significant mistrust and anger in the community. And yet, even now, apparently the responsibility is still on the white community.

On the anti-fronting legislation you are dead wrong. The Bar Council collectively lobbied Burgess to amend it and to make changes while it was still in DRAFT to ensure that Bermudians were not discriminated against. He ignored their requests. This legislation impacts accross the entire community. There is no issue with the concept of anti-fronting legislation on a small island such as Bermuda however it needs to be carefully worded. Admittedly, Burgess isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer but he said no. He had the same attitude "you're only protesting becasue I'm in charge, you're white, I'm black, you're UBP, I'm PLP blah blah blah" The usual crap. He didn't have the wit or intellect to understand that it was a genuine, real concenr to many. What a prick.
Logged
Fast Eddie
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 130
Offline Offline

Posts: 649


View Profile Awards

Ignore
« Reply #28 on: December 21, 2007, 04:36:47 PM »

A few years ago, maybe someone can fill in the details, Burch said in the House(?) to the Opposition, something like - "Don't you get it? We don't care what you think." And there we had the crystaline truth.

All the UBP's sound and fury of taking the moral high ground, promising enhancements to democracy, cutting government excess... landed upon deaf ears. No matter how good the argument or reasoned the thinking, much of the electorate had been primed. The PLP just added night rallies and Fascist rhetoric and the fire was lit.

Why did the UBP three elections running not have the guts to hold major Public forums, properly facilitated, so Bermudians could behold the candidates exposing themselves to the hotseat of Public questioning.

The UBP has allowed itself to be defined by the PLP; they are no longer flesh and blood, no longer relevant.

Logged

"Politics is the art of preventing people from taking part in affairs which properly concern them."  - Paul Valery
bermuda blue
Sr. Member
****

Karma: 68
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 358


View Profile Awards

Ignore
« Reply #29 on: December 21, 2007, 04:45:51 PM »



On the anti-fronting legislation you are dead wrong. The Bar Council collectively lobbied Burgess to amend it and to make changes while it was still in DRAFT to ensure that Bermudians were not discriminated against. He ignored their requests. This legislation impacts accross the entire community. There is no issue with the concept of anti-fronting legislation on a small island such as Bermuda however it needs to be carefully worded. Admittedly, Burgess isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer but he said no. He had the same attitude "you're only protesting becasue I'm in charge, you're white, I'm black, you're UBP, I'm PLP blah blah blah" The usual crap. He didn't have the wit or intellect to understand that it was a genuine, real concenr to many. What a prick.

A few years ago, maybe someone can fill in the details, Burch said in the House(?) to the Opposition, something like - "Don't you get it? We don't care what you think." And there we had the crystaline truth.



So Burch being the replacement for Burgess is probably not going to help much on the fronting legislation then!
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com

Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!