Bermuda Rocks
close
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Top Panel
Login / Profile
Top Panel

The Royal Gazette's

The Royal Gazette's A Right to Know - Giving People Power campaign

A Right to Know - Giving People Power campaign 

BWS Webcam

Webcam

Looking North toward
St. George's

Swag Shop

Bermuda Rocks 

from CafePress

Only $19.99 + S/H

 

Rant Room - Bermuda's #1 Forum

*
*
Home
Help
Search
Calendar
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 09, 2009, 07:23:01 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
76371 Posts in 4155 Topics by 860 Members Latest Member: - Rockys Most online today: 16 - most online ever: 66 (June 14, 2007, 11:37:46 AM)

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Poker is racist now??  (Read 5591 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
SmokingGun
Sucker Star Member
*******

Karma: 670
Offline Offline

Posts: 6406


View Profile Awards

Ignore
« Reply #135 on: March 28, 2008, 01:17:02 PM »

.... first off the US TV industry is pretty much run by the Jews. They're a race all to themselves right? Wink

All kidding aside, let's get back to square one. My take from this whole convo is when will black producers and decision makers start to recognise that continuing to use "black" only events or programmes do not/may not help what most white people consider their (black's) own cause to be. That is full society integration. (JNC explained this well enough.)

In the year 2008 white people see hypocrisy in this. Especially when guys like Sharpton & Jackson get all loud and obnoxious whenever there is a slight against black people.

What I think is white need to just get over the fact that this will continue for a while and just see S&J for who they are today - money grubbers. And there are a ton of money grubbers out there these days of all colour. The one shining light that I see is that there are guys like Obama who are steping up and taking over the roles these guys had in the years gone by. And both blacks and whites are comfortable with people like him. maybe we can knock another 10-20 yards off the dash in the next few years.


.... and alsys30, in your last post it sounds like you're agreeing me wouldn't you say?

Any-hoo I gotta run out for a few hours. Catch you guys later.
Logged
SmokingGun
Sucker Star Member
*******

Karma: 670
Offline Offline

Posts: 6406


View Profile Awards

Ignore
« Reply #136 on: March 28, 2008, 01:21:01 PM »

"That's the whole point... you I can't."

But I'll try. Just for you. Later....
Logged
BlahBlah
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 77
Offline Offline

Posts: 579


View Profile Awards

Ignore
« Reply #137 on: March 28, 2008, 01:28:34 PM »

Interesting thread, thanks.  A lot of parallel to here I thought.  

Any event is racist if it doesn't (or as near as damn it) reflect the population....wow.  Now that notion is truly, truly scary to me.  Now we're forcing people to go to events to up the quota so that the event won't and can't be labelled as racist?  I need some time to ponder that entire notion.  I call a group of friends to go for an afternoon pint, it happens the only ones available are all white, do I have a racist gathering?
My head hurts. TFIF.

with bermuda's history, and referencing these public events in particular, yep. again, nothing explicit, wilfull or conscious; white folk aren't avoiding black folk because they're scared of them(then again, judging by your previous post...), more because they're just going through the cultural motions that were predefined centuries ago.

white folk do this. black folk do this. and that's somehow fine, despite the fact the only reason there's a difference in racial behaviour in a colonized country with our specific history/size is because of slavery and segregation.

the comparison wouldn't be that the only friends available to go grab a pint are all white; it'd be...the bar that you grab a pint at, none of your black friends really seem to ever go. or, despite having a couple black friends, the only people you grab pints with happen to be white. again, no real overt disdain or loathing, just odd coincidences that line up pretty neatly along racial structures. stuff like that. i'm not saying that's your experience, i'm just saying that these completely normal/acceptable behaviours...generally aren't, y'know?

deuces.
Careful.....careful.....a casual observer (lol) of your post would assume that I said whites didn't go to Cup Match because it's rammed full of scary black men....I posited that some whites (based on the fact that it forms part of my thought process ) might not go because there is a perception of gang violence, and I quote:-

Likewise, is it all possible that whites in Bermuda (to have th proportion of white BDAs and white ex-pats would be helpful) are just not interested in THAT cricket game?  Personally I'd rather shoot myself in the face that watch ANY cricket, ever, but sitting in the blazing sun watching  very mediocre cricket (when compared to all that i've been exposed to on TV if I've ever seen any) is not something that interests me.  Add into that the 'perception' .....now, ease away from the keyboard and accept this as MY perception......that there is an undercurrent of gangstaism there.  It's not like we can't say that there has been/is violence at these games, because there has been both on the pitch and off, armed policemen patrol it for goodness sake.

Those are my words...you inserted black...be careful Senator., unless I'm wrong you have projected 'black person' onto gangstaism??

you're right, i DID do that. good catch! that's the stuff i'm talking about; implicit race-based inferrals that are completely presumptive. now, that said, i'm reasonably sure, considering cup match specifically/bermuda generally, when you(as in you)think gangsta-ism, you're not picturing white folks. do you?

now that i think about it, even you writing the word with the suffix dropped to a as opposed to er was a signifier as well, i think.

so, i did presume, but there were indicators that led me to that space. thoughts?


I'm glad you accepted this one and I wasn't being a tool (well ok, maybe a teensy weensy bit) by pointing it out but it's an example of the image that blacks can have of themselves that the Fox guy was talking about, no?

I know nothing about the topic so I'll shut up shortly but it might help to answer a question which is a spin on my very first question; does the fact that an event aired on a channel targetting black people was named the Black Poker Stars Invitational actually defeat the original point of naming it thus?

I can't get too psychological about it as I'm a PLONK on the matter, and I know most here think I'm wrong to see much significance in the nomencalture, but does it speak to the element of self destruction that some see within the black fight for equality?  Does reinforcing the blackness (sorry, lost for better words)  of that event (for all the valid reasons that Thaao and others have alluded to) actually become self defeating by the affect doing it has on whites and others?  Of course I could be the only white in the western hemisphere that thought it odd.  

Hhhmm, re-read this and while I know what I want to say, not sure this captures it, anyway, I'll post and maybe be seen to be picking at a well healed scab but what they heck.
Logged
alsys
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 198
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 855



View Profile Awards

Ignore
« Reply #138 on: March 28, 2008, 01:32:56 PM »

I always considered Jews white but then that's just my opinion. Had a very long and loud discusiion with my mother the other night (over copious glasses of wine) what each country people are within the three main races  - did I say that right?

Anyway, you are correct, social intergration in a complete manner would involve both sides doing this. However, I have found that blacks are much more willing to integrate than the opposite direction. We've had to and that is sad.

And yes, I do agree with you to a certain extent, as I agree with Thaao/CO to a certain extent. Everyone has put up valid points.
Logged

It is hard to tell if a man is telling the truth when you know you would lie if you were in his place."   H. L. Mencken
Casual Observer
Legendary Member
******

Karma: 484
Offline Offline

Posts: 2217



View Profile Awards




Ignore

« Reply #139 on: March 28, 2008, 01:53:08 PM »

Quote

I can't get too psychological about it as I'm a PLONK on the matter, and I know most here think I'm wrong to see much significance in the nomencalture, but does it speak to the element of self destruction that some see within the black fight for equality?  Does reinforcing the blackness (sorry, lost for better words)  of that event (for all the valid reasons that Thaao and others have alluded to) actually become self defeating by the affect doing it has on whites and others?  Of course I could be the only white in the western hemisphere that thought it odd.  


blahblah - I think you've hit on the million dollar question. I will take it perhaps a step further and say: whose responsibility is it to do what? Is it the responsibility of blacks to stop naming events and wait for their invitations to participate in mainstream events? Or is it the responsibility of whites to recognize blacks and include them, providing more realistic representation in the mainstream? Largely, it has been left to blacks to integrate into organizations, and have to deal with the accompanying unpleasantries.

Personally, without the likes of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton who admittedly are sometimes over-enthusiastic, a lot of whites like yourself probably wouldn't take notice of the marginalization of minorities. Black issues would not be brought to the forefront of mainstream America.
Logged

"My role in society, or any artist's or poet's role, is to try and express what we all feel. Not to tell people how to feel. Not as a preacher, not as a leader, but as a reflection of us all.”

John Lennon
BlahBlah
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 77
Offline Offline

Posts: 579


View Profile Awards

Ignore
« Reply #140 on: March 28, 2008, 02:17:46 PM »

Quote

I can't get too psychological about it as I'm a PLONK on the matter, and I know most here think I'm wrong to see much significance in the nomencalture, but does it speak to the element of self destruction that some see within the black fight for equality?  Does reinforcing the blackness (sorry, lost for better words)  of that event (for all the valid reasons that Thaao and others have alluded to) actually become self defeating by the affect doing it has on whites and others?  Of course I could be the only white in the western hemisphere that thought it odd.  


blahblah - I think you've hit on the million dollar question. I will take it perhaps a step further and say: whose responsibility is it to do what? Is it the responsibility of blacks to stop naming events and wait for their invitations to participate in mainstream events? Or is it the responsibility of whites to recognize blacks and include them, providing more realistic representation in the mainstream? Largely, it has been left to blacks to integrate into organizations, and have to deal with the accompanying unpleasantries.

Personally, without the likes of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton who admittedly are sometimes over-enthusiastic, a lot of whites like yourself probably wouldn't take notice of the marginalization of minorities. Black issues would not be brought to the forefront of mainstream America.
I guess I deserve that.
Bah!!  I just wrote a reply and then got kicked out of my computer, I hate that.  Suffice it to say it was a bit of a rant on Sharpton and Jackson and your use of the term 'over-enthusiastic'.  The last time my Alsation puppy got 'over-enthusiastic' he tore a huge hole in my ear...the parallel there would be the Duke Lacrosse team and others that have gone to rat sh1t because of their 'Ask no questions, one size fits all' response to some of these events.  I actually get quite disgusted with them when I know that their status could be better used to serve the perceived victims in ensuring the media stay focused and authorities conduct proper investigations.
To address your first paragraph, my impression is that make an over plea to a racial group to attend an event for example because they are underrepresented there would smack of tokenism and might come across and decidedly condescending but I understand your point and it's not an easy one to answer.
Logged
Casual Observer
Legendary Member
******

Karma: 484
Offline Offline

Posts: 2217



View Profile Awards




Ignore

« Reply #141 on: March 28, 2008, 02:31:34 PM »

blahblah - just for clarification, that was not intended as a dig at you. I was merely basing that on your earlier point that because of your background there are some things which would not have occurred or been apparent to you (as in the underrepresenation on tv) because you haven't ever really had to look for them. Which is natural, and it goes both ways... which is why discussions like this are in some small way helpful because real dialogue requires us ALL to look beyond the end of our own noses.  Wink
Logged

"My role in society, or any artist's or poet's role, is to try and express what we all feel. Not to tell people how to feel. Not as a preacher, not as a leader, but as a reflection of us all.”

John Lennon
BlahBlah
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 77
Offline Offline

Posts: 579


View Profile Awards

Ignore
« Reply #142 on: March 28, 2008, 04:49:15 PM »

blahblah - just for clarification, that was not intended as a dig at you. I was merely basing that on your earlier point that because of your background there are some things which would not have occurred or been apparent to you (as in the underrepresenation on tv) because you haven't ever really had to look for them. Which is natural, and it goes both ways... which is why discussions like this are in some small way helpful because real dialogue requires us ALL to look beyond the end of our own noses.  Wink
My bad, no problemo, have a good weekend, I'm off to ride Keith like a beachfront pony to impress my pals.
Logged
KickinSand
Superhero Member
*****

Karma: 143
Offline Offline

Posts: 1088



View Profile Awards

Ignore
« Reply #143 on: March 30, 2008, 01:31:45 PM »

Oops... cross-posts. Texas Hold'em eh? Time and place, I think you'll get quite a few takers.... Smiley

Now you know we can't talk like that in here SG... I meant to say a rousing game of Texas Hold'em bingo. We all know gambling is illegal!!!!  Wink
This is actually also wrong..hee hee...I'm not picking on you...but if one reads the relevant legislation there's nothing illegal with 8 people sitting round a table, putting in $50 and playing for it, even in licenced premises.  The illegality comes when the 'house' benefits and there are some other technicalities too.

Blahx2 is correct here (contrary to the belief of the CoP), this is the reason the Bda Poker Tour was "asked" to fold their activity. They were using a % to finance the events. Not that I see anything wrong with this, but the law was against them.

As far as poker tournaments are concerned, what you see on TV (ESPN) is usually the final table, basically the best of the bunch. Having personally seen some of the earlier rounds played I can safely say that race is not an issue; there are people of all races, from various countries. 


Logged

"When we blindly adopt a religion, a political system, a literary dogma, we become automatons. We cease to grow."
-- Anais Nin
KickinSand
Superhero Member
*****

Karma: 143
Offline Offline

Posts: 1088



View Profile Awards

Ignore
« Reply #144 on: March 30, 2008, 02:09:11 PM »

Damn Computer...

....Involved in the tournements.

As far as the Black and White issue is concerned I have a couple of points to make..

1. BET (as of 1992) as with most TV/Enterntainment Companies are publically traded companies, their management may be a majority one race or another, but their ownership is equally diverse.

2. The marketing of an event as "Black" is purely that, a marketing thing. It plays on peoples emotions in order to increase the number of viewers. Being an invitational tournement they could invite who they want anyway why use race in the name?



Logged

"When we blindly adopt a religion, a political system, a literary dogma, we become automatons. We cease to grow."
-- Anais Nin
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com

Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!