A national strike for a numpty bus driver that tried to (or actually did) attack a woman in her car??
Puuuleeeze.
It's a point of view I guess but even at the national level, I'm not seeing the link...what pressure are they putting on the police and the DPP?  Government has zero to do with it, contrary to popular belief.  I mean, think about it....from charge to court case can be 6 months, more even.....are all unionised workers going to put their livelihoods at risk for this one fat, angry tool...who blatantly is in the wrong (whether criminally so, is of course debatable)....not feeling it Blankman but there you go.

I think there's a second one on the other side of the street on the other stop light.  Those signs are so far back from the intersection that the only people likely to see them are already stopped for the light.

The intersection is already cross-hatched out.

I'm pretty sure that that sign has no legal validity, though I'm sure that any serving police officers around here can clarify.

You are correct Sir, no legal validity although would just be common decency and good driving. 

The CCTV footage was a bit different in that, if I remember correctly, the bus didn't seem to stop and then turn....it's kinda like you being at a T junction, looking left and right, seeing a vehicle approaching from your right with it's left indicator flashing....you're certainly not going to just pull out in front of it assuming that it's going to perform that turn....are you??  So quite why a bus driver would assume a car would stop simply because it maybe should is beyond me.

Well I certainly wouldn't.  I wouldn't do it anywhere but here indicators might as well just be removed from all vehicles.  Either bikes leave them all all day or cars never use them...either way, they are redundant basically. 

Yeah, I did the same yesterday but the road painting is only good if traffic isn't backed up which it usually is from 9am to 7pm most days!!
The bus driver is still a tool!!

Just my two cents as a born and raised bermudian. The bus driver was an idiot and a whole host of other names and should have definitely been suspended in the least.

But... anyone I know who drives through that intersection knows you are definitely supposed to give way. If you don't then you obviously must have missed that question on your written test. It is a cumbersome system due to the lights being ass-backward especially in rush hour but everyone SHOULD know you always, no matter what, have to give way to buses. It's the law.

Now before you jump on me I am certainly not condoning his actions by any means, but am just clarifying that. And as she gave him the finger first, I assuming she knew that she was supposed to give way. The buses have a giant sign on the back. If you travel that road and have had to stop at the light then you HAVE seen that sign.

Also it is written on the road. If this was her first time EVER travelling that road, I could understand her confusion but come on. We can all surmise it wasn't her first time on Church Street and again, as I said, if you have had to stop at the light right before the pedestrian walk, you have seen the writing on that blocked off part. If you haven't you are a horrible driver who evidently does not pay any attention to the road.

Again, I'm not condoning this, in fact I find it disgusting, but as I said, just to clarify.

Is it? Are you sure?

Nonetheless, this system has been in place that you have to give way since I was a kid and those signs and that procedure for that bus depot has been in place since they opened. No real excuse in my opinion.